Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!mmt From: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Re: Natural Rights Message-ID: <322@dciem.UUCP> Date: Wed, 24-Aug-83 13:59:03 EDT Article-I.D.: dciem.322 Posted: Wed Aug 24 13:59:03 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 26-Aug-83 07:55:45 EDT References: <117@hogpd.UUCP> Organization: D.C.I.E.M, Toronto, Canada Lines: 32 ================= I disagree with the thesis that rights are "natural". The writer who claimed that rights are pervasive in animal societies, and that such rights had survival value, is anthropomorphizing the animal kingdom. ================= The attitude expressed by this comment represents an all too common fallacy: that humans are not animals. No matter what differentiates us from other animals, there is a lot more that we share. Most of our behaviour patterns are founded on those that have developed over the billions of years or learning how to get along, and I think it rather presumptuous of any individual to think that his mind can come up with a better solution - hey, presto - for particular ethical problems that arise moment to moment. Sure, we have cultural norms that differ among human societies. Sure, we differ from most other animals in being able to string together a few elementary concepts in a "logical" manner that includes conditionals. We don't know to what extent other animals have that facility, but it isn't enough to allow them to develop syntactically complex language (although clever chimpanzees can apparently use rudiments of conditional syntax sometimes). There is a legitimate distinction between legal "rights" and natural "rights". My claim is that natural "rights" represent our verbalizations of survival patterns developed over the billenia. And if you don't think that accepting the rights of others over your own (apparent) selfish interest can be a survival trait, read the Metamagical Thema essays on the Prisoner's Dilemma in Scientific American this Spring. Even bacteria may well (operationally) respect each other's rights. Martin Taylor