Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxe.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!we13!ihnp4!ihuxe!rainbow
From: rainbow@ihuxe.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.rec.bridge
Subject: followup on test your play R1
Message-ID: <280@ihuxe.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Aug-83 11:23:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxe.280
Posted: Thu Aug  4 11:23:45 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Aug-83 08:29:34 EDT
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 28

It appears that I made a small mistake in the original presentation
of the problem. Its been some time since I heard about this hand and
my memory is not what it used to be. My apologies. The previous version
of the hand can be made easily by a squeeze in spades and diamonds. As
I recall this was not the actual case because of a lack of transportation.
So in the modified hand I've given South only 1 spade. This I believe is 
now the correct version of the problem.
  
                                  North
                                  S:AJ42
                                  H:KT2
                                  D:
                                  C:AKQJT9
                  West                                East
                  S:                                  S:KQT98765
                  H:J987654                           H:
                  D:987654                            D:KQ2
                  C:                                  C:87
                                  South
                                  S:3
                                  H:AQ3
                                  D:AJT3
                                  C:65432
  
North/South arrived at a nice peaceful contract of 6C. But East decided
to sack at 6S. North wouldn't be denied and bid 6NT making South the  
declarer. What leads by West will allow South to make the hand? There are
more than six such leads and less than thirteen.