Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notes version 1.1usg 6/21/82; site ihlpf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!gummo!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!burl!sb1!ll1!otuxa!we13!ihnp4!ihlpf!3363ewf
From: 3363ewf@ihlpf.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: "Re: Biblical Dietary Guide - (nf)"
Message-ID: <187@ihlpf.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 7-Aug-83 18:00:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihlpf.187
Posted: Sun Aug  7 18:00:59 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 8-Aug-83 19:32:10 EDT
Organization: BTL Naperville, IL
Lines: 9

#R:houxm:-49000:ihlpf:22600029:  0:415
ihlpf!dap1    Aug  7 12:31:00 1983

I've heard several times that Christ's coming "invalidated" several rules
listed in the O.T.  In this case though, the verses quoted from the N.T. seem
to state pretty explicitly that it just wasn't right to avoid certain types
of food, irregardless of whether Christ came or not.  Nothing is mentioned
about the fact that Christ's coming is what specifically changed all the rules.
Is this a contradiction or not?