Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!dr_who
From: dr_who@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: rights w/o restrictions?
Message-ID: <1610@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 7-Aug-83 21:50:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1610
Posted: Sun Aug  7 21:50:28 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Aug-83 01:43:22 EDT
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 7

Tim Maroney asks for comments on Thelemic morality.  I wonder how he thinks
rights can exist or be advocated without the existence/advocacy of
restrictions (taboos, if you will).  Seems to me that to say humans have a
right to (example) life, liberty and pursuit of happiness means that others
are *required* to (at least) not-interfere with their life, liberty, etc.

--Paul Torek, U of MD College Park