Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxr.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxr!stanwyck From: stanwyck@ihuxr.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women,net.news.group Subject: Re: net.women.only Message-ID: <570@ihuxr.UUCP> Date: Mon, 22-Aug-83 09:47:29 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxr.570 Posted: Mon Aug 22 09:47:29 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 22-Aug-83 20:25:47 EDT References: <1983@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: BTL Naperville, Il. Lines: 29 This brings me to the point of needing to express a feeling I have been fighting with for a while. <<<<< FLAME ON >>>>> WHY IS IT OK FOR {BLACKS, WOMEN, ANY-OTHER-"MINORITY"} TO HAVE A SPECIAL GROUP FOR THEM WHICH MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL POPULATION MAY NOT JOIN, BUT IF MALE WASPS TRY THE SAME THING IT IS PREJUDICE?? <<<<>>>> I have seen over the last several years the growth of a number of widely accepted groups pressuring for the advancement of particular groups. These groups have included racial groups (polish people, black people, hispanic people, amer-asians, etc) as well as womens groups, groups of the elderly, etc. It seems that any so-called minority (note that women are not in fact a minority in our population) can have some group pushing for itself, but everytime some white (unidentifiable genetic background) male suggests that white men in general should do likewise, all the other groups immediately shout "prejudice!". Do not we as white men have the same rights as any other member of society, or must white men continue to be the second class citizens of our society, without equal rights in the judicial and political processes? don stanwyck : ..!ihnp4!ihuxr!stanwyck : 312-979-6667 : btl @ naperville, il