Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watcgl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watcgl!gcsherwood From: gcsherwood@watcgl.UUCP (Geoffrey C. Sherwood) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: net.women.only Message-ID: <714@watcgl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 25-Aug-83 11:54:33 EDT Article-I.D.: watcgl.714 Posted: Thu Aug 25 11:54:33 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 26-Aug-83 09:50:47 EDT References: <218@abnjh.UUCP> Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 53 { I find all women groups to be very positive. My experiences to date are Elaine Powers, a Women's Center that I belonged to, and two college courses - "Philosophy of Feminism" and "Self Defense for Women". Anyone out there attend an all women's school? As far as this anti net.women.only stuff goes it's another male scheme to keep us isolated from one another. The white male reverse discrimination crap makes me laugh. * * * * * * * Shelley Heretyk * * * * * * * * * * * } As regards the second paragraph, the first sentence strikes me as being more than slightly paranoid. The idea that all of us scheming males are out here attempting to keep the sistern isolated from each other is patently ridiculous. It saddens me to see such crap from fellow computer science types. The second sentence is just as bad. Discrimination is discrimination. I haven't owned a slave in years, and I hardly ever beat women. I should be taken on my own merits, such as they are, without reference to such inborn traits as being white (well, slightly tan, actually) and male. Why should this be any different than for black, red, yellow, or pink polka-dotted people who are male, female, both, or neither? I oppose the formation of net.women.only because I see it as discriminatory. If men attempted to form net.men.only and excluded women, the net would reverberate with cries of discrimination -- and rightly so. I do not see how the reverse case is any different. If you want to get a private mailing list and send mail to each other, you are welcome to. Mail is different from broadcast media. In summary, we are all, first and formost, people. Our rights stem from that. Discrimination will not end until the general public sees it that way, too. Demanding special privileges for sub-groups only retards these efforts, antagonizing those who do not have these privileges and inviting retaliation. enough, Geoff Sherwood U. of Waterloo