Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site tekgds.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!tekgds!charliep
From: charliep@tekgds.UUCP (Charles E. Perkins)
Newsgroups: net.women.only
Subject: hair
Message-ID: <1317@tekgds.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Sep-83 06:12:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekgds.1317
Posted: Fri Sep  2 06:12:10 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Sep-83 11:48:22 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 14

Since opinions were requested, I'll add mine!  I prefer the way
women look who have hairy legs, mainly because stubble is ugly, hair is
not, and besides, I applaud women who refuse to waste their time attacking
their legs with a razor.  Armpit hair, we don't see as much of
except in situations where there are better things to look at.
I don't think armpit hair is *pretty*, but it looks better than
an *armpit*, anyway.  And, again, stubble is no fun for anybody.

Now, if Americans could do without makeup, wouldn't that be nice!
What a messy way to cover up one's natural charm.

Charles Perkins

PS. Best of luck for this new newsgroup.