Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!speaker
From: speaker@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.ai
Subject: Re: Another Defintion of Intelligence
Message-ID: <2655@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Sep-83 20:23:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2655
Posted: Mon Sep 19 20:23:45 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Sep-83 03:07:48 EDT
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 21


	From fred Mon Sep 19 19:36:50 1983
	To: speaker
	Subject: Re: Another Definition of Intelligence
	
		And therein lies the problem with this idea.  What
		if the machine doesn't feel compelled to interact
		with its environment?  Is this a sign of inability,
		or disinterest?
	
	Obviously it's too intelliegent to want to deal with us.
	

Is it?  It might just be plain too stupid.  Or it might think we are.

Anyway, your incessent dribbling and piddling over the net bores me...
I think I'll go play a stimulating game of '8-D Super-mega-hyper-rogue'
with that cute VAX over there.
-- 
					- Speaker
					speaker@umcp-cs
					speaker.umcp-cs@UDel-Relay