Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ssc-vax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!carlson From: carlson@ssc-vax.UUCP (Lee R Carlson) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: More oil discussion Message-ID: <505@ssc-vax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 12-Sep-83 13:16:49 EDT Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.505 Posted: Mon Sep 12 13:16:49 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 13-Sep-83 05:47:30 EDT Organization: Boeing Aerospace, Seattle Lines: 36 I have been silent of the discussion of late concerning motor oils. Recently, I spoke with a friend of mine from DEtroit who is the Fuels and Lubricants Research department head at a major automotive research facility in the area. My question was: "So what's the latest word on synthetic oils?" He had two interesting points: 1) Synthetic and mineral based oils differ primarily in the base lubricant. The additives used in both are essentially the same. So, while the base oil in the synthetic oils will "last" indefinately, the additives (which have become the most important part of the oil) wear out at the same rate. Auto manufacturers do not support the claims of the synthetic oil manufacturers of longer oil change intervals. Also, the new Mobil 1 is a 5W-30 after insistance by manufacturers that 5W-20 was too thin for high temperature usage. Apparently the new ARCO syn. has 25,000 mile interval on the label. This is supported by the ARCO marketing guys, but the technical people do not support it. 2) His recommendation is to use 10W-30 SF-CC whenever possible. Apparently his department's research indicates that only a few 10W-40 oils that claim SF-CC actually meet this standard, whereas most 10W-30 oils do. In fact, owner's manuals of cars made by his company will promote the use of 10W-30 SF-CC, and all Diesel owner's manuals will contain a warning not to use 10W-40 since so few meet the "CC" rating. So, I use what he uses, 10W-30 SF-CC from Sears. Lee R. Carlson - Boeing Aerospace - Seattle - ...uw-beaver!ssc-vax!carlson