Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site laidbak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-vax!eagle!mhuxi!houxm!ihnp4!laidbak!mark
From: mark@laidbak.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.bugs,net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Usefulness of access(2) - (nf)
Message-ID: <172@laidbak.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 23-Sep-83 01:42:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: laidbak.172
Posted: Fri Sep 23 01:42:30 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Sep-83 03:37:06 EDT
References: <2916@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Organization: LAI, Westmont, IL
Lines: 34

NOTE: This is in response to an article in net.bugs, asking for an
      eaccess() system call to check permissions based on effective
      user- and group-ids. I've added net.unix-wizards to the news
      group list, since it belongs there, but shouldn't be stranded
      from the original article.

Rather than another application-specific system call, how about a
more general solution:

	int permiss(path, uid, gid)
	char	*path;
	int	uid;
	int	gid;

Permiss() determines filesystem permissions to 'path' by user 'uid' in
group 'gid'. Returns a value built up from 04 for read-, 02 for write-
and 01 for execute-access.

Permiss() could even replace access(), with a compatibility function
in libc:

extern int
access(path, mode)
char	*path;
int	mode;
{
	return ((permiss(path, getuid(), getgid()) & mode) == 0 ? -1 : 0);
}

This is still a partially-baked idea, but I believe it to be "cleaner"
than access(), and preferable to adding yet another system call.

			Mark Brukhartz
			..!{allegra,ihnp4,ittvax,trsvax}!laidbak!mark