Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site fluke.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!ron From: ron@fluke.UUCP (Ron Pankiewicz) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Controlled Substances Message-ID: <719@vax2.fluke.UUCP> Date: Mon, 26-Sep-83 13:36:38 EDT Article-I.D.: vax2.719 Posted: Mon Sep 26 13:36:38 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Sep-83 08:56:51 EDT References: <809@hou5e.UUCP> Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, Wash Lines: 37 To the extent that (abuse of) drugs tends to make some people degenerate (physically, not morally) bums, we all suffer -at least in an economic sense: heavy users suffer declinig productivity on their jobs, so their employer and fellow employee's are cheated out of that person's fair contribution; some heavy users are unable to finance their habit, and so must resort to prostitution or burglary to buy their fix (admittedly this problem might be reduced -but not eliminated- if all drugs were legalized and readily available on the open market); those that resort to (other) crimes to support their habit may end up in prisons... creating another expense for taxpayers; long-term users often end up on expensive rehabilitation programs -and everyone who pays medical insurance premiums or taxes for public health services ends up paying for these programs. [This is not meant to a review of Reefer Madness. Many people can handle such substances without any problem. Many other people have addicition-prone personalities or even a biological tendancy towards additction to certain substances.] Any society is, of course, generally free to adopt whatever set of rules it wants... and expect to reap the consequences. But unless our society decides that it is going to let all drug users that become abusers literally rot in the street, we all suffer from allowing the free use of drugs. And even if they're left to rot in the gutters, we still end up paying for the cost of cleaning up the ultimate mess...