Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site zehntel.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!zehntel!berry
From: berry@zehntel.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Flame --> Orphaned Responses - (nf)
Message-ID: <1228@zehntel.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Oct-83 04:18:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: zehntel.1228
Posted: Sat Oct  1 04:18:04 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Oct-83 11:24:18 EDT
Sender: berry@zehntel.UUCP
Organization: Zehntel Inc., Walnut Creek, CA
Lines: 19

#R:cbosgd:-38700:zinfandel:14500027:000:717
zinfandel!berry    Sep 30 09:23:00 1983

I think Mark Horton is not entirely correct in his explanation of the
cause of "Orphaned Response".  If I recall from the last time I 
dived into that code,  if a response comes in to the notes system
which has no base note to attach to, an empty note is created for it.
So that the administrator will be aware of this, it is given the
title "Orphaned response" and the author "<site>!Unknown".

On reflection, I cannot think why the title in the response (If there is
one) cannot be used.  Over the next few days I will peer at the code in my 
spare nanoseconds and see if I can get together a fix....

(But don't hold your breath)

Berry Kercheval		Zehntel Inc.	(decvax!sytek!zehntel!zinfandel!berry)
(415)932-6900