Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alberta.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!ubc-visi!alberta!chrys From: chrys@alberta Newsgroups: net.followup,net.games,net.games.rogue Subject: Games on multi-user systems. Message-ID: <450@alberta.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Sep-83 17:31:13 EDT Article-I.D.: alberta.450 Posted: Thu Sep 8 17:31:13 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 9-Sep-83 19:36:58 EDT Organization: U. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Lines: 38 I include here an article that I felt I should make comment on: "On our system here 4.1bsd VAX11/780 we obtained version 5.2 rogue or what ever it was and found we could not restart a game. The local powers rather than cure this returned to version 3.6. This is because games received a justified low priority. Since then games have be removed completely - sigh. Richard Loken" I just wanted to make two comments: 1) I feel games to be a great relief after a session of long concentration or to relax before getting down to work. Hence, I feel games to be a necessary (?) part of a system (even research systems). 2) We cannot have games on systems if the users cannot be responsible for their actions to the degree that they a) don't get their work done or b) bother others (who are trying to get their work done) by i) creating undo load on the system, ii) making a lot of noise in common work areas, and/or iii) tying up needed resources (e.g. terminals) during busy periods. Our system has had a lot of the problems associated with point 2 above. The systems people are valiantly attempting to create an "academic/research" environment on the system. I just hope that the irresponsibilty of few won't cause loss of priviledges to all. My plea is that we (general user community) be VERY sensitive to what's going on on our respective systems in order to avoid such penalties. I see that this is equally applicable to the entire USENET system, as well. Chris Helmers {sask,vax135,ubc-vision}!alberta!chrys