Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!fluke!kurt
From: kurt@fluke.UUCP (Kurt Guntheroth)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: .22 vs .25 vs .357 ...
Message-ID: <697@vax2.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Sep-83 11:21:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax2.697
Posted: Fri Sep  9 11:21:47 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Sep-83 08:35:40 EDT
References: <2471@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, Wash
Lines: 13

Well I don't think a .357 is any good either.  It just hasn't got enough
stopping power when you are up against armor.  I prefer to send in a platoon
of infantry with tank support or perhaps an airstrike with napalm and
phosphorous bombs.

But why stop there.  Lets nuke criminals until they glow, especially if they
don't have a nuclear counterforce capability.  There is no substitute for
victory.

(flame off)

Couldn't this discussion go someplace else like net.handguns or net.padded.cell
or net.jokes