Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: Value of Human Life vs. Value of Property Message-ID: <3221@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Thu, 29-Sep-83 17:22:06 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.3221 Posted: Thu Sep 29 17:22:06 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 29-Sep-83 17:22:06 EDT References: <537@qubix.UUCP>, <543@pyuxhh.UUCP> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 40 D. Peak's article was good proof of a principle a lot of PRO-gun folks would agree with: people who do not know how to handle guns, and what their limitations are, should never be allowed within ten feet of a loaded firearm. Consider Scenario 4: v v v v v v v v v v v v Just as you reach the top of the stairs on the way down, you realize that you are being an imbecile. When the police (of a large American city, say) want to clear a house of a possibly-armed-possibly-dangerous person (or persons), they use a squad of professionals equipped with body armor and automatic rifles. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PLAYING AT, TRYING TO DO IT YOURSELF?!? You return to your bedroom, locking the door (we assume that there are no other family members outside it, otherwise minor modifications to this plan would be needed). You call the police (you *do* have a phone by your bed, don't you?). You sit tight. You will use your handgun only if the person(s) out there try to break into the bedroom by force, in which case it's a pretty good bet that your life is in serious danger anyway. Does sound a lot more sensible, doesn't it? People who think that a handgun makes them invincible have no business owning a gun. Proper training should be a prerequisite to owning a gun for defence. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry