Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxhh.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!ariel!hou5f!hou5g!hou5h!eagle!mhuxi!mhuxj!mhuxl!mhuxm!pyuxi!pyuxhh!dxp
From: dxp@pyuxhh.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Value of Human Life vs. Value of Property
Message-ID: <552@pyuxhh.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Sep-83 18:27:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxhh.552
Posted: Fri Sep 30 18:27:07 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Oct-83 06:51:56 EDT
References: <3221@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Piscataway
Lines: 17


 I appreciate and commend Harry Spencer's scenerio,with a couple of
minor amendments 
   1) put the handgun back in the dresser and sit tight with a shotgun
   2) you would have certain logistics problems if your family occupied
      more than 1 bedroom(in my case it doesn't)

 The above would seem to suggest an optimum solution to protecting your 
immediate family but not protect your possessions.But that is a different
story as some followers of the net seem very philanthropic about material
possessions.BTW I have no possessions of redeeming value that could not be
easily replaced so I probably would sit tight in the bedroom and save using
my handgun(s) until I next went to the range(it's been about 6 weeks since
I went so it's about time).

                       Dave Peak(BTL(CSO?),South Plainfield,N.J.)