Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ihuxf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxi!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxf!parnass
From: parnass@ihuxf.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.ham-radio
Subject: Re: cordless phone repair (retraction)
Message-ID: <710@ihuxf.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Oct-83 10:29:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxf.710
Posted: Mon Oct  3 10:29:28 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 3-Oct-83 23:41:02 EDT
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 30



       On the repair of	cordless phones, Cliff Shackelton writes:

		 -------------------------------------------

		  "....	since  cordless	 phones	 are  also  covered
		 under	FCC part 68, A FCC 2nd or 1st class license
		 doesn't mean diddly squat.  Only  the	factory	 or
		 it's  authorized  agent may repair a phone. If	you
		 want to repair	phones you need	to send	a  repaired
		 unit  in  for	FCC  Part 68 testing and submit	the
		 data to the FCC and get a FCC number to  stick	 on
		 the bottom of the phone....

				 FLAME OFF"
		 -------------------------------------------


       My apologies.  My first article was based on a September	 28
       regulatory  discussion  with  Ms.  Flora	 Stewart, FCC Field
       Operations Bureau in Chicago.

       After reading Cliff's heated response on	October	3, I called
       the  FCC,  and spoke with a Mr. Sklom.  This fellow contrad-
       icted the information given in the first	conversation!

-- 
============================================================================
Robert S. Parnass, AT&T Bell Laboratories, ihnp4!ihuxf!parnass (312)979-5760