Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!gummo!whuxlb!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ixn5c!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-ec:ecn-pc:ecn-ed:vu
From: ecn-ec:ecn-pc:ecn-ed:vu@pur-ee.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Your replies to "stat paradox"
Message-ID: <214@ecn-ed.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Sep-83 11:29:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: ecn-ed.214
Posted: Thu Sep 22 11:29:51 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Sep-83 01:11:12 EDT
Lines: 13


	OK, now I know why I was wrong. In fact, I figured out that my
mistake was the same as that someone who got 1/2 when solving the
drawer-gold coins problem (remember it ?): I counted the case "happening
for both" twice [ those getting 1/2 in the above problem made the inverse
mistake: they counted gold-gold once while they're supposed to count it twice]

	Anyway, now I know why I was wrong, thanks to all your replies.
SinSI canI can't reply to all of you since there are too m~any replie|s.| |@@@@@
But believe that I am very grateful.

	Hao-Nhien Vu (pur-ee!norris)
Again, thanks.