Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!cca!ima!ism780!jim From: jim@ism780.UUCP (Jim Balter) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Re: Re: Jim Balter's circle proof Message-ID: <45@ism780.UUCP> Date: Fri, 23-Sep-83 02:53:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ism780.45 Posted: Fri Sep 23 02:53:00 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Sep-83 02:05:08 EDT Lines: 38 Originally Silvio said my answer was wrong; I haven't seen an article in which he says either that he doesn't understand my proof or that it is sound; perhaps it is on the way. re: "... the odds that all the points fall within a semicircle is the sum of the odds that any of the arcs falls within a semicircle; since the points are equivalent, p = n * p_one_arc." This seems to be based on the false rule that the probability of a thing happening N times is N times the probability of a thing happening once. --- I carefully indicated that the N cases included all the possibilities *and* they were *mutually exclusive*, but you omit this from your quotation above: "Since the n different arcs include all the ways that the points might be formed into a semicircle, and since no two of the arcs can both fall within a semicircle (with the exception of singular cases), ..." (All occurrences of the erroneous "chord" in the original message have been replaced by "arc".) The sum of the probabilities in a complete partitioning certainly adds up to one. This is nothing at all like talking about something happening N times. It happens once, in one of N equally probable and *mutually exclusive* ways. There are N *mutually exclusive* cases; the total probability is the sum of the probabilities of these N *mutually exclusive* cases, P = P1 + P2 + ... + PN. Since P1 = P2 = ... = PN, P = N*P1. This hardly seems bizarre to me. If you want bizarre, consider the recently mentioned "paradox" where the probability of a "phenomenum" with likelihood .5 happening twice was .5+.5, with no consideration for whether the two occurrences were :-* mutually exclusive *-: Jim Balter (decvax!yale-co!ima!jim), Interactive Systems Corp --------