Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!duke!unc!mcnc!idis!mi-cec!dvk From: dvk@mi-cec.UUCP (Dan Klein) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Let's Make a Deal Message-ID: <165@mi-cec.UUCP> Date: Mon, 3-Oct-83 09:48:23 EDT Article-I.D.: mi-cec.165 Posted: Mon Oct 3 09:48:23 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Oct-83 01:15:41 EDT Lines: 13 Scott- Sorry. While your math is correct, your assumptions are wrong. Indeed, the probability of any door being the winner is 1/3. Having ruled out the door Monty shows you gives a 2/3 probability of *either* of the two remaining doors as being the good one (WRT the set of three). Given that the probability of *any* door being good as 1/3, you seeing a bad door does not change the probability of either remaining door being good. Once you know that door #1 is bad, the probability of doors #2 & #3 being good (or bad) is now 1/2. It don't make no nevermind what you do! Stay or change, your chances are the same, and you'll look just as foolish when he shows you the cow and milking stool whether you changed or not. -Dan Klein, Mellon Institute, Pittsburgh