Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!mark
From: mark@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: 1574
Message-ID: <2550@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 11-Sep-83 23:46:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2550
Posted: Sun Sep 11 23:46:46 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 12-Sep-83 19:47:06 EDT
References: machaids.454 <391@5941ux.UUCP> <709@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 24


	From: gillies@mit-eddie.UUCP

	1:  There is evidence that alot of the testing that CU
	    claims to have done, is never done.

What evidence?  Your anonymous source?  That isn't evidence.

	2:  Their articles often have misleading pictures, such as
	    a picture of a "panel of experts".

Are we talking about the same magazine?  I have read Consumers
Reports for 10 years and they have NEVER shown a picture of
a panel of experts.  Do you read it?  Is it possible you
have confused CU with one of the look-alikes, like consumer
digest?  (The look-alikes are terrible).  This statement
of yours is so obviously wrong that it casts a LOT of doubt
on anything else you and your informant say.
-- 
spoken:	mark weiser
UUCP:	{seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!mark
CSNet:	mark@umcp-cs
ARPA:	mark.umcp-cs@UDel-Relay