Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!duke!unc!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary From: dgary@ecsvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re:Why by Apple Message-ID: <1204@ecsvax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 19-Sep-83 11:33:22 EDT Article-I.D.: ecsvax.1204 Posted: Mon Sep 19 11:33:22 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 19-Sep-83 22:29:02 EDT References: ihuxm.557 Lines: 28 This business of operating systems seems to have confused people. Let me see if I can shed a tiny bit of light without getting too boring. BASIC on the Apple uses a pathetic disc operating system that runs as a part of the BASIC language and requires all sorts of nonsense to do anything. Apple has recently announced (but I have not seen) an allegedly much improved operating system for its //e. (When I say "Apple" I mean Apple ][ or //e. The Apple /// has its own operating system, Apple-SOS, and the Lisa has a monster one as we all are well aware.) The UCSD P-system is an operating system written to run on a non-existent computer called the "P-machine". This computer can be "emulated" by a fairly small program on just about any computer. Apple users desperate for a real operating system (and a real language) have been able for some time to buy the "Apple language card" which is some extra memory replacing some ROM in the address space and generally bundled with the P-System and the UCSD Pascal compiler. When an Apple user speaks of using the "Pascal operating system", he or she is talking about the P-System. Although it is sophisticated in many respects, the P-System is too slow for certain applications. It is also surprisingly non-standardized (try switching between the IBM version and the Apple version - you'll soon find some disturbing differences underlying the superficial similarities). Its biggest flaw from a user standpoint is the disc format. Files are stored contiguously, which requires that discs be "K)runched" periodically. Personally, I'll wait for Unix. (Supposedly, MS-DOS 2.5 and following are going to be compatible with Xenix...)