Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!wivax!dyer From: dyer@wivax.UUCP (Stephen Dyer) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.gay Message-ID: <18683@wivax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Sep-83 04:00:00 EDT Article-I.D.: wivax.18683 Posted: Tue Sep 20 04:00:00 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Sep-83 22:03:59 EDT References: <514@qubix.UUCP> Organization: Wang Institute, Tyngsboro, Ma. 10879 Lines: 41 I will try to keep this from becoming a harangue. 1.) There is really only one criterion concerning the creation of 'net.gay', and that is demand. If the demand isn't there, then the point is moot. I would like to get a better feeling for the demand, other than the initial postings in 'net.singles.' 2.) If the group is moderated, as has been suggested, then the editorial problem of "unsuitable" material disappears. It is outrageous that the topics of "teenagers" and "suitability" are brought up selectively for 'net.gay' in the face of such high-brow groups as 'net.jokes'. 3.) The name isn't an issue, but I am hard-pressed to come up with a word that is any less of a red flag to those who would care. 4.) However, 'net.personal' isn't the right group, because the discussion isn't necessarily about personal subjects. Some have expressed the opinion that individual discussions should be subsumed within already existing news groups--i.e., the status quo. Fine, but the same argument could have been used against many other equally valid groups (i.e., net.women.) 5.) Andy's point about "lack of political clout" is well spoken, but he errs when he uses it as an excuse for not creating the group. Sites are always free to carry whatever newsgroups they wish (how long do we have to repeat this?) and if you think local management would frown on it, don't carry it. 6.) Perhaps it's belaboring the obvious, but I invite the many who have spoken against the formation of the group to substitute their favorite minority in place of the word 'gay' in 'net.gay'. While I am not accusing anyone of explicit discrimination, the exercise is most chilling. 7.) Lastly, read point #1 again. /Steve Dyer decvax!wivax!dyer sdyer@bbn-unix