Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site spanky.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!hocda!spanky!ka
From: ka@spanky.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Late Night with David Letterman - (nf)
Message-ID: <496@spanky.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 25-Sep-83 15:29:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: spanky.496
Posted: Sun Sep 25 15:29:00 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 27-Sep-83 03:06:02 EDT
References: <2914@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, N. J.
Lines: 10

I agree that if net.tv is getting unmanageable it can be broken up into
subgroups.  However, I don't think that there should be one subgroup for
every program that has a large following.  Intead it should be broken up
into subgroups based upon types of programs.  E. g. net.tv.soap for soap
opera lovers, net.tv.sitcom for situation comedies, net.tv.public for
public television.  I am not advocating these groups; it takes a bit of
consideration to come up with a good subdivision scheme and these groups
were just listed off the top of my head.  I do believe that they are an
improvement over creating groups for single programs.
					Kenneth Almquist