Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!kpno!ut-sally!jsq
From: jsq@ut-sally.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: triple (quadruple, etc) homonyms
Message-ID: <281@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 17-Sep-83 17:52:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.281
Posted: Sat Sep 17 17:52:28 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Sep-83 12:48:30 EDT
References: <244@houxa.UUCP>, <402@hou5a.UUCP>
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 5

About the only false homonym that annoys me more than to for too
(ignoring your for you're and it's for its) is do for due.
-- 
John Quarterman, CS Dept., University of Texas, Austin, Texas
{ihnp4,ut-ngp}!ut-sally!jsq, jsq@ut-sally.ARPA (formerly jsq@utexas-780.ARPA)