Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!tekmdp!dadla!dadla-b!russ From: russ@dadla-b.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Enough picking on Mormons Message-ID: <531@dadla-b.UUCP> Date: Fri, 16-Sep-83 10:19:53 EDT Article-I.D.: dadla-b.531 Posted: Fri Sep 16 10:19:53 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 17-Sep-83 09:27:40 EDT References: tekmdp.2220 Lines: 23 Jon, I want to take issue with one statement that you make. >whereas even some Mormon archeologists are now admitting that >there is absolutely no proof that Book of Mormon people ever existed. You seem to indicate that this is some new understanding that is now being realized by Mormon archeologists. I contend that this has been the standard response. It is true that many archeologists have not considered the existence of the Book of Mormon people a proven fact. Mormon archealogist would be no different. There has been no proof. But there also has been no proof that they did not exist. And this allowed their faith to continue while more evidence is being examined. I do believe that the situation is starting to change. Only now is there starting to be an agreement of where the Book of Mormon lands were exactly. And there are still a great number of known archeological sites that have never been excavated. The fact that there might be no proof in archeaology for the Book of Mormon is only significant if there is proof that they didn't exist. Until the later exists which doesn't look likely now, we shall wait for more information to provide the proof of the Book of Mormon people. Russell Anderson Tektronix