Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site nsc.uucp
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!menlo70!nsc!ramona
From: ramona@nsc.uucp (Ramona Wu)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: physical attraction to MOTSS
Message-ID: <383@nsc.uucp>
Date: Wed, 7-Sep-83 19:33:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.383
Posted: Wed Sep  7 19:33:15 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Sep-83 12:21:57 EDT
References: <318@linus.UUCP>, <26@princeton.UUCP>
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 10

The standards for physical attractions for females are more clearly
defined than those of males. The standards may differ from person to
person, but mass media sees to it that "attractive" women have more
in common than "attractive" men.

Does this make any sense?  If you don't believe me then, try talking
to an equal number of males and females on what they consider physically
attractive for both. (I have)   

						RAM-unit