Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/26/83; site ih1ap.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ih1ap!jgd
From: jgd@ih1ap.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: RE:  RE:  Honesty in Relationships (Rob Mitchell)
Message-ID: <230@ih1ap.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Sep-83 15:29:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: ih1ap.230
Posted: Thu Sep 22 15:29:21 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Sep-83 01:48:30 EDT
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 30



Rob,           

In your article you stated. "My honesty with a person depends on 
which catagory the person falls into."  Of your three catagories
1) casual aquaintances
2) friends
3) Friends 

your "Friends", "These 5 people have earned my respect and love, 
and I feel obligated to be truthful to them at all times."


What I don't understand is why can't you have the same attitude
toward the first two groups as the third?

How does one "earn" your "Friendshp"?

Is the "obligation to be truthful" to your "Friends" one that you
enjoy or is it a burdon to you?

Why do you attempt to catagorize people and thus LIMIT your 
relationships with others?

Do you belive your approach is condusive to personal growth?


                                   Puzzled