Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site flairvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!flairvax!ellis
From: ellis@flairvax.UUCP (Michael Ellis)
Newsgroups: net.social
Subject: Re: Hair: long, short, and no... - (nf)
Message-ID: <248@flairvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Oct-83 04:14:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: flairvax.248
Posted: Wed Oct  5 04:14:00 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Oct-83 04:29:26 EDT
Organization: Fairchild AI Lab, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 16

Long hair is not necessarily as time consuming as some women would have you
think. Admittedly, having long hair with that fako cosmo look DOES require
the daily removal and re-application of many chemicals, not to mention all
the machinery, and so on...

The problem seems to be that most people believe that long hair has to
look a certain kind of way. I'll never understand the lunacy of peer
group pressure. My long hair takes only about 10 minutes out of my
day. If it were 2 feet long, I don't know how much extra time it'd take,
though (it's 1 foot at the longest parts now).

BTW, women with skinheads and mohawks can be quite beautiful, too. There
are so many ways people can look, it's too bad most people select from
such a limited set of choices.

-michael