Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!dave
From: dave@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Sherman)
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: baserunning
Message-ID: <2282@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Sep-83 00:53:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2282
Posted: Mon Sep 19 00:53:36 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Sep-83 02:20:25 EDT
References: <446@nmtvax.UUCP>
Organization: The Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto
Lines: 13

This does not make sense to me.

I assume that if something is good for team A, it is not good
for team B, and vice versa.

If it's to team A's advantage NOT to send the runner from 1st to
2nd on the wild pitch, because then the next batter would be walked,
then by definition team B will be better off by walking the next batter
even with the runner still on first!

Dave Sherman
-- 
 {cornell,decvax,floyd,ihnp4,linus,utzoo,uw-beaver,watmath}!utcsrgv!lsuc!dave