Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!courtney
From: courtney@hp-pcd.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: 59 cents - (nf)
Message-ID: <1945@hp-pcd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Sep-83 03:33:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.1945
Posted: Tue Sep 27 03:33:53 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 29-Sep-83 09:57:54 EDT
Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR
Lines: 13

#R:cca:-575700:hp-pcd:19100017:000:498
hp-pcd!courtney    Sep 26 09:11:00 1983

In point "1)", Charlie seems to be saying that the statistician doesn't
see the "intangibles in job performance" such as the "type and quality
of work" or "whether the employee adds or detracts from the morale of the
workplace".  In implying that the statistician is not seeing these things
when exposing a "59 Cents" wage discrimination, Charlie is saying that
men are doing all of these "intangibles" better than women, hence justifying
the wage differential.  And I say to that:  HOGWASH!

c.l.