Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alberta.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!ubc-visi!alberta!stephen
From: stephen@alberta
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: I am a himman (him man).
Message-ID: <456@alberta.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-Sep-83 02:14:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: alberta.456
Posted: Fri Sep 16 02:14:13 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Sep-83 16:09:15 EDT
Organization: U. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Lines: 10


 How about returning MAN to its gender-generic roots and using a
work like HIMAN to specify an explicitly male man.  I have a much
easier time adding one word to my vocabulary than I do changing
hundreds of others. 
 
   Besides -- MAN is one one syllable and PERSON is two (BOY am I
LAZY).

      Stephen Samuel 
       (alberta!stephen)