Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!ISAACSON@USC-ISI
From: ISAACSON%USC-ISI@sri-unix.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.ai
Subject: Re: Parallelism & Consciousness
Message-ID: <13164@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Nov-83 00:02:00 EST
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.13164
Posted: Fri Nov  4 00:02:00 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Nov-83 01:26:00 EST
Lines: 22


  From Minsky:
  That's what you get for trying to define things too much.

Coming, as it does, out of the blue, your comment appears to
negate the merits of this discussion.  The net effect might
simply be to bring it to a halt.  I think that it is, inadvertent
though it might be, unkind to the discussants, and unfair to the
rest of us who are listening in.

I agree.  The level of confusion is not insignificant and
immediate insights are not around the corner.  However, in my
opinion, we do need serious discussion of these issues.  I.e.,
questions of subcognition vs.  cognition; parallelism,
"autonomy", and epiphenomena; algorithmic programability vs.
autonomy at the subcognitive and cognitive levels; etc.  etc.

Perhaps it would be helpful if you give us your views on some of
these issues, including your views on a good methodology to
discussing them.

-- JDI