Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!houxm!mhuxi!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj
From: jj@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Clar ... HUMBUG! - Wrongthink st - (nf)
Message-ID: <2106@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Oct-83 11:13:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2106
Posted: Mon Oct 24 11:13:01 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Oct-83 23:14:28 EDT
References: <3390@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 23


Rah!  Rah!  "Re"


Sorry *S*C*O*T*T*!

Well, actually, you were partly right.  I was being more than
a bit sarcastic.

BUT.  You still miss the point.  When a person uses a handgun, it's easy
to see who was directly responsible for an injury.  When someone
doesn't have one to begin with, and is injured because of the
lack of a weapon <a situation that shouldn't occur, so much
for ideals> it's a bit harder.  There isn't anyone who is 
directly, clearly in the wrong.  (I notice that no one has
asked WHY the gun was necessary, but that's the right question to
ask, so I'm not surprised it wasn't asked.  After all, why
would a person need a weapon in the first place?>
-- 
 O   o   From the pyrolagnic keyboard of
   ~              rabbit!jj
 -v-v-
 \^_^/   (pyrolagnic- from pyro<=>fire and lagnic<=>eating.)