Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!tekcad!ricks
From: ricks@tekcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: The next stage of handgun regulation - (nf)
Message-ID: <85@tekcad.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Oct-83 22:25:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekcad.85
Posted: Tue Oct 25 22:25:51 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Oct-83 02:24:00 EDT
Sender: ricks@tekcad.UUCP
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 23

#R:rabbit:-208300:tekcad:900016:000:1101
tekcad!franka    Oct 25 09:23:00 1983

	jj, again your mouth runneth over. I do not recall any statement in
the note in question being represented as "logic". You say it is "dishonest"
to do so. Very well. But is it dishonest to utter a statement and then not
identify it as logical OR emotional? Most of us assume that the net readers
out there are intellegent enough to differentiate between the two (something
which you seem to think they cannot be, for you are always pointing out
"errors" of this type).
	You speak highly of honesty, jj. By this I believe you mean not de-
liberately making a misleading statement. Again, I defy you to show ANY part
of the original article which 1) was emotional in nature AND 2) was purported
to be logical anywhere else in the article. If you cannot find any, I do not
see how you can find this article "dishonest", unless you have a completely
different definition of the word than myself (and I believe, the rest of the
world).

               				From the truly menacing,
   /- -\       				but usually underestimated,
    <->        				Frank Adrian
               				(tektronix!tekcad!franka)