Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj
From: jj@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame
Subject: Re: U.S. invades Grenada
Message-ID: <2126@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Oct-83 10:33:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2126
Posted: Thu Oct 27 10:33:49 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 28-Oct-83 08:09:55 EDT
References: <328@sun.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 61


Quote gnu(I wondered if he was still alive)
	"AND THEN LET'S THROW THE BASTARD OUT!"


I have a better idea.  Let's throw the cursing name-callers who
don't bother to justify their insults off the net.  :-)

	I just love these narrow minded, paranoid liberal
responses.  It's odd that I keep getting mail that tells
me that all conservatives are narrow minded paranoids.  Perhaps
gnu is a closet conservative.

	I notice the knee-jerk defamation never seems to stop.
I don't know the story about Granada yet, so I'm not going
to either defend (or criticize) this "invasion".  I do know
that lots (originally 50, now up in the hundreds, of cuban
"civilian" advisors <Yeah, sure, civilians with AK47's, anti-aircraft
missles, and ground-ground missiles.  Civilians, my gnu!> ) have
been captured, so at least we weren't there first.  I also
know that the new "airport" that the USSR (along with Cuba) built
just conveniently had runways long enough (and strong enough)
for backfire bombers.  Even though the width (or so CBS told us)
of the runways was marginal for 747's, it was for a "jetport",
not bombers.  <The bombers don't require the same width.  They're
just hard to stop.>

	Congratulations, gnu, on demonstrating the knee jerk,
narrow minded, paranoid attitude so typical of the liberal
establishment. <I don't argue against the goals, or the 
avowed intent, but goals are never met, and intent never
seems to lead in the right diretion, so>  Don't criticize
me for the use of the words narrow minded, paranoid, and knee
jerk, they've all been used to describe every conservative
in existance.  In fact, we've been told that all conservatives are,
BY defination, sub-human because they're narrow minded  and paranoid.
I just wanted to point out that your totally uninformed (at least you
don't SHOW any information, or act as though you wanted to show
any) comments aren't any less narrow minded (after all, you
clearly KNOW that anything a conservative does is going to
be bad, don't you?) or paranoid (you KNOW that something's going
to happen to you because of the conservative menace) than
any conservative in the country.  I include, for this
purpose, such questionably conservative demigogs as
Jesse Helms (who knee jerks about liberals just the way you
knee jerk about Reagan), Strom (Senate bill two) Thurmond,
and Orrin (let's give them all our moral code to live with) Hatch.
You, sir, are a liberal demigog.<Am I spelling that right?>

If you have information (other than from the village voice, or
equivelant), informed discussion, or even idiological comments,
make them.  If you want to try to push people around with
your abusive words then send your abuse to net.dev.null.

Hi, John.  Sorry to be so rude, but I don't see anyone (at least over
the net) being polite to me.
-- 
 o   O   from the pyrolagnic keyboard of
   ~              rabbit!jj
 -v-v-
 \^_^/