Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!phyllis
From: phyllis@utcsrgv.UUCP (Phyllis Eve Bregman)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: net.sheep - (nf)
Message-ID: <2516@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Oct-83 11:57:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2516
Posted: Tue Oct 18 11:57:54 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Oct-83 12:42:57 EDT
References: <136@hscfvax.UUCP>
Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto
Lines: 15

I don't think that there is any reason to insult Steve over the
network.  If you objected to his objections of net.sheep, then you
should have sent him mail.  I happen to agree with him at this
particular point in time.  Explanation.  It took a lot of arguing
back and forth and a lot of Usenet space to create net.motss.  The
article suggesting net.sheep sounded very much as if it was making
fun of this newsgroup, and those people who tried hard to make
certain it was created, and that it would be taken seriously have
a right to object.  If you want to suggest the creation of net.kinky
(or whatever), then post your article to the proper newsgroup.

-- 
		Phyllis Eve Bregman
		CSRG, Univ. of Toronto
		{decvax,linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd,utzoo}!utcsrgv!phyllis