Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1exp 10/6/83; site ihnss.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!hou5h!hou5g!hou5f!hou5e!hou5d!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ihnss!warren From: warren@ihnss.UUCP Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: "Hack" is a sacred word? Message-ID: <1770@ihnss.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Oct-83 17:51:52 EST Article-I.D.: ihnss.1770 Posted: Thu Oct 27 17:51:52 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 31-Oct-83 04:29:30 EST References: <114@ccieng6.UUCP> <1313@rlgvax.UUCP> <848@mit-eddie.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, Il Lines: 29 May I suggest a constructive alternative. How about "Software Artist" as an alternative to hacker. It suggests someone who is involved in a mysterious creative activity with the following properties: 1) Frequently it's done for sheer enjoyment, rather than profit. 2) It's persued by some people as an obsession, rather than a rational choice. 3) The product is evaluated in terms of unmeasurable esthetic beauty, rather than an absolute standards. This to me fits very well with the image of a computer hacker. (Someone who persues computing for the joy of it, NOT the infantile/criminal element taking pot-shots at data banks). Probably, the term hacker will survive forever in our jargon, whether the public puts the right meaning on it or not, but If we want people who enjoy computing to be regarded in a favorable light, we better come up with a term that isn't tied to nerds, crooks, or other public undesirables. -- }sOS?fzo~~n{~W~O~;;3?=u~_~=9?{umo~g{om~u}gnu}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}69s{umo~f{s:9y:>s.signy~uz>~/n9/w}zzun/.signy~uzu Warren Montgomery ihnss!warren IH x2494 }9:s~~n{~W~O~;;3?=u~=9?{umo~g{om~u}gnu}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}y~~~}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}y~~~}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}y~~~}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}y~~~}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}:3}>s~s[>}>s}sOS?g{o~>s~sZ>}>s}sOS?g{~n{~W~O~;;3?=u~_~=9?{umo~g{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~_~=9?{umo~g{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~_~=9?{umo~g{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~=9?{umg{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~=9?{umg{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~=9?{umg{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~={umg{om~u}gnu}}}}}3?=u~={umg{om~u}gn