Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!mmt From: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) Newsgroups: net.jokes.d Subject: Re: offensive jokes Message-ID: <451@dciem.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Oct-83 16:57:18 EDT Article-I.D.: dciem.451 Posted: Thu Oct 27 16:57:18 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 27-Oct-83 17:26:04 EDT References: <1341@utcsstat.UUCP> Organization: D.C.I.E.M, Toronto, Canada Lines: 41 There is a distinction between "offensive" and "damaging" jokes, although it is not always clear to the author to which class a particular joke belongs. I think ethnic jokes aimed at a truly vulnerable group are quite likely to be damaging rather than offensive. Someone (sorry, I didn't keep the article) pointed out that jokes portraying blacks as dumb and talking funny are likely to reinforce that stereotype among readers already inclined to think of blacks that way. On the other hand, the jokes about armless-legless people or Hellen Keller are unlikely to damage anyone, although they may be offensive. Last year I submitted a couple of flames about leper jokes, because I think lepers are a class likely to be damaged by reinforcement of a false stereotype. Few enough people know what leprosy really means, and the disease has been regarded with horror throughout the ages. The propagation of leper jokes *may* make it harder for a leper to function in normal society, even though there should be no reason for difficulty. Hence, I ask people not to submit leper jokes. Racist jokes aimed at other groups that are not vulnerable may be offensive, but they may also be funny. A stereotype may be built for the purpose of joke-making, and the group concerned may be quite obviously different from the stereotype, or may have the moral force to fight back. Such jokes are fine in my book (but probably should be rot13'd anyway). Racist jokes aimed at one's own group fall in a peculiar class. The English make quite savage jokes about themselves, and I think Jews do as well. But woe betide an outsider making the same kind of joke! In a heterogeneous net such as this one, I think that the group identity of the author should be considered irrelevant. Even if you are making a joke against your own group, consider it from the viewpoint of a reader who thinks the joke is written by an outsider. So: Dictator MMT's rules: (i) Think carefully whether your joke might be truly damaging to someone. (ii) If it is non-damaging but offensive, send it (rot13). Sub-rule: Try to find an old usenetter to see whether your submission will be well known before you send the 23rd copy of something. Martin Taylor