Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxss.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxi!mhuxl!mhuxm!pyuxi!pyuxss!aaw
From: aaw@pyuxss.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: the 'broken' statement
Message-ID: <180@pyuxss.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Oct-83 11:32:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxss.180
Posted: Thu Oct 13 11:32:24 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Oct-83 08:56:39 EDT
References: <301@ihuxa.UUCP>, <3246@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Piscataway
Lines: 16

the reasonable extension  to C semantics would be:
		if ( for (first(); cond(); next();) )
			succeed();
		else
			fail();
with all statements returning a value. sounds real scary -functional
programming anyone- how about:
	if (if (a)
		b();
	    else
		c();
	   )
	else
	   0;
				Aaron Werman
				{eagle|ariel}!pyuxss!aaw