Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!cmcl2!philabs!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!james
From: james@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Re: 'Choose' your axiom - (nf)
Message-ID: <3039@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 7-Oct-83 19:27:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3039
Posted: Fri Oct  7 19:27:59 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Oct-83 19:24:38 EDT
References: <3145@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 9

1) What is the book you found this in?

2) Why do you say this is counter-intuitive?  It seems to me that if
I divide up two spheres in the same "way", then the pieces will
necessarily be in one-to-one congruence/correspondence.  The only
difference between corresponding pieces will be their sizes, which
should be in the same ratio as the original spheres.

  --Jim