Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ulysses.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxi!houxm!ihnp4!ulysses!smb
From: smb@ulysses.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: No more he/she
Message-ID: <644@ulysses.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Oct-83 16:33:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: ulysses.644
Posted: Sun Oct  9 16:33:42 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Oct-83 10:32:16 EDT
References: <117@shell.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 13


	From: starr@shell.UUCP
	Newsgroups: net.misc
	Subject: No more he/she
	Message-ID: <117@shell.UUCP>
	Date: Tue, 4-Oct-83 18:11:44 EDT
	Organization: Shell Development CS Group, Houston, Texas

	Read the October Byte, on pp 230, last paragraph. The article was written
	by a broad, and she uses the single gender reference "she". Men should
	do the same!

I agree; as long as we have examples like this around, "he" vs. "she" vs.
"he/she" is comparatively minor.