Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!Hamilton.ES@PARC-MAXC.ARPA From: Hamilton.ES@PARC-MAXC.ARPA Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Smut Message-ID: <13016@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Oct-83 21:40:31 EST Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.13016 Posted: Wed Oct 26 21:40:31 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 31-Oct-83 07:20:47 EST Lines: 23 From: Bruce Hamilton Other than "The Devil in Miss Jones" and "Caligula", I don't think I've seen much porno with truly interesting plots. It seems the best you can hope for is a couple of decent 5-minute sex scenes. The other problem is that the same dozen or so actors & actresses seem to be in ALL the flicks. WHY??? It gets rather boring after a while -- I've pretty much given up on porn in recent years. I heard that Linda Lovelace has turned into some sort of Jesus freak and has been trying to claim that she was "coerced" into making Deep Throat. Sure... Anybody know what ever happened to Abigail Clayton? Marilyn Chambers is still light-years beyond all the rest. Does anybody else believe that a nympho/ exhibitionist personality is likely to be associated with certain physical traits? It strikes me that an amazing number of the actresses in these films have a sort of high-cheekboned, cat-eyed quality -- they really are a special breed! --Bruce