Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou2a.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!hou2a!murphy From: murphy@hou2a.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics,net.taxes Subject: earmarking tax money Message-ID: <161@hou2a.UUCP> Date: Mon, 31-Oct-83 15:08:36 EST Article-I.D.: hou2a.161 Posted: Mon Oct 31 15:08:36 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 3-Nov-83 05:24:47 EST Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 31 Has there ever been any serious consideration of the idea of taxpayers ear-marking their tax money for use only in certain areas? Perhaps several broad categories could be established, such as defense, education, infrastructure, health services, welfare, etc. and a taxpayer's money could only be used for projects that fall within the categories that the taxpayer specifies, and in the proportions that she/he specifies. I realize that such a scheme must have pitfalls, in particular, it would take a lot of the fun out of government, but then spending would more closely reflect the will of the population, and congress would have less to argue about since some major decisions would not have to be made. It would seem that the number of categories would have to be limited to be practical, and the politicians could still amuse themselves arguing over how to squander the money within a given category. Given current computerization capabilities, such a scheme could probably be implemented, after all, IRS has some very sophistocated ways of figuring out how much it can remove from the wallet of each and every taxpayer, so a few extra bits of information telling IRS where to send the money (and perhaps where it can send itself) would not be much added burden. This would probably bring us too close to a truly participatory democracy for the comfort of the big guns in Washington, but then, we never promised them a rose garden. How about it, kids? Rich Ganns BTL HO hou2a!murphy