Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1exp 10/6/83; site ihuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert
From: seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.taxes
Subject: Re: earmarking taxes
Message-ID: <691@ihuxl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Nov-83 13:42:32 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxl.691
Posted: Wed Nov  2 13:42:32 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Nov-83 06:52:29 EST
References: <164@hou2a.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, Il
Lines: 18

So far no one has mentioned that we already have this, to a
very tiny extent. We can decide if we want $1 to go to the
campaign fund. There's a little box for it on the federal tax
form.

I think ear-marking funds is a great idea.  I don't see it
happening though.  The bozos in power sure aren't going to give
up that power if they can help it. It would take something
like Cal's prop 13 to change things.  Dream on.  Too many
people are willing to go along with whatever disasters
the gov't comes up with. If they didn't, why do we still have
this 55mph garbage. If people don't like it, why can't we
get the law changed? If people *do* like it, why aren't
they obeying it?

			the mildly opinionated keyboard of
			Dave Seifert
			ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert