Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site hammer.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!tektronix!tekecs!hammer!hyder From: hyder@hammer.UUCP (Paul K. Hyder) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Color balancing Message-ID: <266@hammer.UUCP> Date: Sat, 15-Oct-83 18:22:58 EDT Article-I.D.: hammer.266 Posted: Sat Oct 15 18:22:58 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Oct-83 00:48:50 EDT References: <564@avsdT.UUCP> <5485@cornell.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR. Lines: 33 The machines in current use for photofinishing resemble the old Integrate To Gray 5-S printers about like vaxen resemble the first computers. There are still some of the old printers left and that may be the source of poor color quality. For the record: 1. Color is usually not checked in large photofinishing labs at the end. It cost too much and competition is driving prices down. If you get a print that is bad, SEND IT BACK. You become their final inspector and you work cheap. [Side note, there are still lots of people out there that don't know a color print can be printed in any color desired.] 2. Current printers in use scan the negatives, usually in over 100 points. The resulting matrix is used to color balance the print, computers everywhere. They produce results that are outstanding, at over 12000 prints per hour. One person can run several of the beasts. 3. Reprints are sometimes made on older printers, watch the quality of reprints. 4. For stable results send your film to a large photofinisher, find out where your film is going. Remember that stores change their labs rather fast. [And if money is no object use a small local custom lab.] Lots of luck. More information of color balance is easily found in your local camera shop. (And there's this great school in Rochester, N.Y. if you have a year and want to really learn color.) Paul Hyder {...tektronix!tekecs!hyder}