Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!andree
From: andree@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Observations on net.motss, end-of-wo - (nf)
Message-ID: <3615@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-Nov-83 00:23:42 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.3615
Posted: Wed Nov  9 00:23:42 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Nov-83 03:16:51 EST
Lines: 16

#R:ssc-vax:-57600:uokvax:8300012:000:724
uokvax!andree    Oct 30 17:06:00 1983

First, motss == members of the same sex. What they discuss, I don't know -
I found out what it was and then tuned it out.

The problem with turning off netgroups that discuss sins is deciding what
is/isn't a sin? Who gets to make the decision? For instance, I don't think
there is anything sinful in sex (choose your favorite flavor) between
consenting adults, but public advocating one form over another, or advocating
discrimination against other based on sex or sexual preference, is wrong.
I don't know if people use net.motss to advocate homosexuality. If they do,
it should be turned off; if not, it should be left on. Of course, we should
turn off net.religion, as people use it to advocate their religion...

	<mike