Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!whuxle!pyuxll!eisx!npoiv!npois!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!ut-sally!jsq
From: jsq@ut-sally.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re:  -ms or -mm macro package ?
Message-ID: <211@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Oct-83 00:58:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.211
Posted: Mon Oct 24 00:58:18 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 21-Oct-83 04:36:38 EDT
References: <12502@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 18

The 4.1xBSD nroff can be hacked to support the USG -mm macros by adding
one command.  It's about ten lines of code.  If you don't want to do that,
you can do a simple global replacement on the -mm macros and take care of
most of the offending cases (it has to do with page numbering).

Getting the System V nroff up on 4BSD is also not really that hard.

My impression of the BRL System-V-on-4BSD emulator thus far is that it is
a useful idea but needs more work.

It's not clear why anybody wants to compare -ms and -mm.  Comparing -me
and -mm would be more appropriate.  The -me macros do several things the
-mm ones don't, such as produce decent indexes.  The -mx macros that come
with 4.2BSD (basically -ms plus indexes, and so forth) also might be
a contender.
-- 
John Quarterman, CS Dept., University of Texas, Austin, Texas
{ihnp4,kpno,ctvax}!ut-sally!jsq, jsq@ut-sally.{ARPA,UUCP}