Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!ariel!houti!hogpc!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiuccsb!eich
From: eich@uiuccsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Senate vote/Choice - (nf)
Message-ID: <3177@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Oct-83 05:35:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.3177
Posted: Sun Oct  9 05:35:43 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Oct-83 08:30:23 EDT
Lines: 8

#R:hplabsb:-188400:uiuccsb:12700008:000:217
uiuccsb!eich    Oct  8 22:48:00 1983



It's not a public service to cite hypothetical and extremely improbable
hard cases in order to argue against general proscription (i.e. Law).
I though this topic was done to death and banned by general weariness...