Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!mason
From: mason@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Mason)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Women's natural superiority at sympathizing
Message-ID: <2461@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 12-Oct-83 19:40:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2461
Posted: Wed Oct 12 19:40:11 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Oct-83 08:01:39 EDT
References: <2460@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto
Lines: 14

Quoting (more or less) from Dave Sherman...
"...[DS] approve of women who stay home and raise families.  They are
using their *natural* talent for mothering/nuturing/caring/sympathizing."

..As opposed, I suppose, to their *unnatural* [*freak*?] talent for
deciding/thinking/advising/estimating that they do in
the "world of work"?

The biology of human beings is not as important as the sociology of
human beings in determining what they do, and what they do well.

 -- Dave Mason, U. Toronto CSRG,
        {cornell,watmath,ihnp4,floyd,allegra,utzoo,uw-beaver}!utcsrgv!mason
     or {decvax,linus,research}!utzoo!utcsrgv!mason   (UUCP)